By Ben Okweingoti
Environmental conservationists and tourism stakeholders in Watamu town, Kilifi County, have raised strong objections to the proposed construction of an affordable housing project at a public amusement park, warning that the development would irreversibly damage the area’s environment and tourism appeal.
Led by conservationist Justin Kitsao and hospitality investor Steve Curtis, the group is calling on the government to relocate the project to an alternative site, arguing that the proposed location is the last remaining environmentally friendly public park and a key gateway into the resort town.
The project, which is expected to comprise about 600 housing units, is planned for land adjacent to the Watamu Chief’s office. Opponents say the site is home to decades-old Neem trees and serves as an open public space where community meetings are held, while also forming the first impression for visitors arriving in Watamu.
“This park is the face of Watamu,” Kitsao said. “Once houses are built here, the natural look of the town will be destroyed. We are not against the affordable housing project, but it should be implemented in a different location. This place is very special to residents and conservationists.”
Kitsao further noted that the site has previously hosted major public gatherings, including political rallies addressed by President William Ruto, and warned that its destruction would be a significant loss to the community.
Tourism investors have also expressed fears that the project could undermine Watamu’s status as a premier beach destination. Curtis, who has invested heavily in the local hospitality industry, cautioned that proceeding with the development at the park could trigger an investor exodus.
“Watamu is the face of Kenya’s beach tourism,” Curtis said. “Putting up ugly houses here will be detrimental to the tourism industry. If this project goes ahead at this site, I will be the first to pull out my investment, and many others will follow.”
Residents and stakeholders insist that Watamu has ample land where the affordable housing project can be established without sacrificing critical green spaces. They are urging the government to balance development needs with environmental conservation and the protection of tourism assets that sustain the local economy.
The group has appealed to national and county authorities to reconsider the project’s location, warning that failure to do so could have long-term economic and environmental consequences for the coastal resort town.
